Artem Loginov

R&D knowledge should compound, not evaporate.

I build AI-native systems for manufacturing R&D teams, and advise leaders on the process changes that make the technology actually stick.

What I Do

Current Focus: Wicely

Building AI-native SaaS for R&D management in mid-market manufacturing. Helping product engineering and research teams save 20-30% of their weekly time through systematic data collection, team collaboration, and compounding knowledge.

Why purpose-built matters: R&D teams need data sovereignty, security from inception, and team-wide memory. Enterprise AI isn't consumer AI at scale, it's a fundamentally different product built for different requirements.

Core capabilities:

If that sounds familiar: book a 30-min intro call →

The core problem

The Compounding Gap

Most R&D teams I work with face the same problem. They generate knowledge constantly: through experiments, supplier evaluations, customer conversations, competitive research. But the organisation doesn't hold onto it.

Projects end and the learnings stay in someone's notes. Engineers leave and take six months of context with them. Decisions get made in Slack threads and become irretrievable three weeks later.

The result: the team starts from scratch, repeatedly. The same mistakes resurface. The same ground gets covered. The compounding that should happen, doesn't.

This is the problem Wicely solves. It's also the lens through which I approach every advisory engagement: not "how do we add more process?" but "where is knowledge leaking, and how do we make it stick?"

How I Work

Background

Track Record

Working Together

Currently focused full-time on building Wicely. Limited availability for part-time advisory engagements in product strategy, customer discovery, and AI-native workflow design. Subject to capacity and strategic fit.

How engagements typically work:

  1. Intro call (30 min, free): A short conversation to understand your situation, the problem you're solving, and whether there's a genuine fit.
  2. Scoping session: If there's a fit, we define the specific problem, agree on measurable outcomes, and set a realistic timeline. Typically 4-8 weeks.
  3. Focused engagement: Structured, time-boxed work with clear deliverables and a weekly check-in to stay aligned and adjust course.

Who This Is For

Good fit

  • Mid-market manufacturer (50-500 employees) with an active R&D or product engineering team
  • R&D workflows that feel fragmented: scattered tools, unclear ownership, or knowledge that lives in someone's head
  • A leader who can champion change internally and has budget for a focused engagement
  • Teams that want measurable process improvements, not just more software

Not a fit

  • Early-stage startups looking for a full-time product manager or hands-on delivery lead
  • Enterprise organisations with multi-month RFP procurement processes
  • Teams looking for someone to manage a pre-defined roadmap or run sprints
  • Engagements requiring full-time on-site presence

If that describes your situation: let's talk →

Principles

📍 Based in Barcelona, Working Globally | 🌐 English, Spanish, Catalan, Russian

Get in Touch